WAAL: Wisconsin Association of Academic Librarians

 

Best Practice Example

Name: Sara Shutkin
Title: Archivist/Reference Librarian
Institution: Alverno College Library
Street Address: 3400 South 43rd Street
City/State/Zip: Milwaukee, WI 53234
Phone: 414-382-6202
Email: sara.shutkin@alverno.edu
Fax: 414-382-6354

Title of practice of implementation method: Evaluating Web Sites

Primary Audience: Intermediate; undergraduate students in a 200-level Professional Communication class
Secondary Audience:

Describe the practice: I typically use this exercise with a 200-level Professional Communication class, but I’ve used a similar exercise with a couple of other intermediate level classes.
This class has an assignment to do research for a persuasive speech. One instructor of this class has her students focus on communication-related topics. The instructor of the other section allows her students to have a broader choice. In advance of the class, I find a large number of Web sites (many of questionable value e.g. “Feline Reactions to Bearded Men” http://www.improbable.com/airchives/classical/cat/cat.html ; “Feminists Against Censorship” http://www.fiawol.demon.co.uk/FAC/ ; “Exploring Nonverbal Communication” http://zzyx.ucsc.edu/~archer/ ; etc.). I write the Web site name and URL on little slips of paper and put them in an envelope. Students are given a handout on “Evaluating Web Sites” that we go over as a group. Then the class is divided into small groups of 3 or 4 students. Each group selects a Web site slip from the envelope and is given an instruction sheet with questions to be answered while viewing the Web site. After about 10 or 15 minutes the students return to the larger group for a debriefing. Make sure that each group has a chance to report on their findings. The discussion will flow naturally and they will have learned a good lesson about the Web.

TIPS: Try and have more Web site examples ready than you think you’ll need (at class time a site might not be working and a group may need to select another one). As close to the class time as possible, check the sites to make sure they are still working.

Give students some criteria to follow when evaluating Web sites. I have students answer the following questions (which are on their instruction sheet) when looking at their group’s Web site:
1. Who’s Web site is it? (author)
2. Do they have an agenda?
3. Is the site accurate/legitimate? Up-to date?
4. Would you use it as a source for your speech?

Walk around and assist students as they are doing the exercise. (I do this in our Reference room instruction area and then the students use the workstations in that room; it could be done easily wherever there is access to multiple workstations).

Competencies addressed through this practice:
6. Critically evaluate the information retrieved.

Supporting materials/resources used and their format: "Evaluating Web Resources" - A handout by Jenny Schmidt that outlines criteria for evaluating web sites.

Special Requirements: None

References consulted: None. I think I got the idea from the ACRL preconference on Library Instuction using the Web held in Chicago in June, 2000.

Handout - pdf

[Back to Best Practice Examples]    [Info Lit Committee Home]

URL: http://www.wla.lib.wi.us/waal/infolit/Shutkin.htm
Revised:  December 17, 2002

Home - WAAL web siteBoardMembershipCommitteesConferencesPublicationsAbout WAALAbout WLAAbout ACRL
© 2002    -     Site Index (text only)
Wisconsin Association of Academic Librarians
A Division of the Wisconsin Library Association
5250 E.Terrace Dr. Suite A-1
Madison, WI 53718-8345
Please send all comments to the WAAL Web Site Manager